Skip to content
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linked In
Fegreus & Broderick

Fegreus & Broderick

  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Estate Admin
    • Trustee Services
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
  • The Firm
    • Michael Broderick
    • Edward Fegreus
    • Barry Gordon
    • Tatiana Barsukova
  • Contact Us
  • Career Opportunity
  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Estate Admin
    • Trustee Services
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
  • The Firm
    • Michael Broderick
    • Edward Fegreus
    • Barry Gordon
    • Tatiana Barsukova
  • Contact Us
  • Career Opportunity

Will Contests in Massachusetts

By: Michael Broderick
Published: April 14, 2015
Categories:
Probate and Estates
Tags:
Estate Administration
Will Contests

Anyone seeking to challenge the validity of a will offered into probate must initiate a proceeding known as a will contest. Grounds for initiating a will contest include the following:

  • Allegations that the person who created the will (the “testator”) was “not of sound mind,” under the “undue influence” of another, or otherwise lacked capacity at the time the will was created;
  • Allegations of fraud, forgery, or improper will execution; and
  • Claims that the proposed will was revoked and/or that a more recent will exists.

It is important for anyone seeking to contest a will to consider that the process is a form of litigation that can be very costly and should only be entered into after legal consultation.

Who Can Contest?

To initiate a will contest, an individual must be able to demonstrate her interest in the estate, known as “standing.” In other words, the contestant must be able to show that under her proposed set of facts and legal theory, the contestant stands to receive some interest in the estate. Take the following example: the child of a testator has been omitted (disinherited) by a will offered into probate. The offered will leaves everything to the testator’s long-time gardener. If the child can demonstrate that the will is invalid (for example, on the basis that the will is a forgery), the child will inherit her “intestate” share of the estate (i.e. the inheritance provided to the child by law in the absence of a will). The child therefore has standing to contest the will. In contrast, the testator’s best friend, to whom the offered will leaves nothing, lacks standing because even if the will were determined to be invalid, the best friend would take nothing by intestate succession.

How and When Does One Contest?

Generally, a will must be offered into probate within 3 years of the testator’s death. G.L. c. 190B, § 3-108. To understand how and when a contestant may enforce her claim thereafter, it is important to understand the distinction between the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code’s informal and formal proceedings. (See, An Introduction to Probate and Estate Administration in Massachusetts). An informal proceeding is designed to allow quick opening and closing of estates. The trade off, however, is that an informal proceeding leaves open the possibility of future contests: it lacks the finality of a formal decree as to the validity of a will. Accordingly, where a will has been informally allowed, a contest may be filed within 3 years from the date of the testator’s death or 12 months from the informal allowance of the will, whichever is later. In this situation, the contestant will file a petition for formal proceedings to adjudicate her claim.

Where a will is first offered into probate in a formal proceeding, a contestant has a much smaller time frame to first make her case. This is because a formal proceeding is designed to adjudicate the validity of a will once and for all. To be able to make that binding determination, the Court requires the will proponent to serve and publish a “citation” giving notice to would-be contestants that they must participate in the proceedings and present their claims now, or be forever barred. The citation, issued by the Court in response to a formal petition, will contain two deadlines that the contestant must meet: (1) the specific date upon which the contestant must first file an appearance in the action (known as the “Return Date”, which is usually 2 to 3 months from the filing date of the petition); and (2) the requirement that the contestant file a written Affidavit of Objections containing the contestant’s factual and legal claims within 30 days of the Return Date. G.L. c. 190B, § 1-401(e). If the contestant misses these deadlines, she may have forever missed her day in court, and the formal proceeding to admit the will continues without her participation.

Most of us are familiar with the basic documents, or “pleadings,” involved in a civil lawsuit: the plaintiff files a “Complaint,” to which the Defendant files an “Answer.” While a will is filed with a “Petition” and a contestant files an “Objection,” a will contest is a form of litigation and it is therefore helpful to think of these probate pleadings as equivalent to a Complaint and an Answer, respectively. The proponent of the will is asking the Court to declare that will valid. The contestant, in filing an Objection, is responding to the proponent’s factual claims and offering a competing set of facts to the court that become the basis of the parties’ legal arguments as to why the will is or is not valid. Like a typical civil lawsuit, a will contest entitles the parties to discovery, including depositions, interrogatories, document production, etc. The Court will hold conferences and hearings on evidentiary issues and motions made by the parties and, at the end of that adversarial process, will issue a final decree and order as to the validity of the contested will.

If you are the personal representative of an estate and confronting a possible will contest, or feel that you have an interest in an estate and would like to consider initiating a contest, please feel free to call or e-mail us for a further discussion. Our office has experience in administrating Massachusetts probate estates in voluntary, informal, and formal proceedings, including will contests.

Post navigation

Previous: Inheriting Registered Land
Next: No-Contest Clauses

More Like This

No-Contest Clauses

The Purpose and Effect of In Terrorem Clauses in Massachusetts Wills

Read More
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Administration of Estates
    • Trustee Services
    • Trust, Estate, and Real Estate Litigation
    • Real Estate Conveyancing
  • Insights
  • Notice Regarding Attorney Advertising

Fegreus & Broderick, LLP

21 Custom House Street, Suite 480
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
t: (617) 737-9100 | f: (617) 737-9123
info@fegreuslaw.com

When an estate doesn’t have enough assets to cov When an estate doesn’t have enough assets to cover debts such as taxes, funeral expenses, medical bills, outstanding loans, and other creditor claims, it’s considered insolvent.

In Massachusetts, a Personal Representative (P.R.) who realizes the estate may be unable to pay all obligations must represent the estate as insolvent to the court. This ensures debts are paid in a specific order of priority, provides guidance for distributing remaining assets to creditors, and protects the P.R. from personal liability for wrongful payments.

Payment of claims and expenses by a P.R. can be complicated, particularly where the total amount of claims approaches the full amount of the estate. If you're a P.R. or heir of an estate with concerns about insolvency or payment of claims, please give us a call.
Wondering if you can sell a house out of an estate Wondering if you can sell a house out of an estate? 🏡 Here’s a quick rundown.

A well-prepared estate plan makes selling a property much easier for the Personal Representative (P.R.). If the Will clearly gives the P.R. the “power of sale,” they can list and sell the home without needing court approval or permission from heirs, as long as the sale is in the estate’s best interest (i.e., no sweet-heart deals to friends and insiders).

If the “power of sale” isn't included in the Will, the P.R. has to go through the court, which can add extra time and expense.

If the property is held in a Trust, the Trustee usually has the same ability to sell without court involvement, provided the sale is in the best interest of beneficiaries. 

In either situation, the P.R. or Trustee works with real estate professionals just like any other seller, while the lawyers handle any legal documentation necessary to transfer the title smoothly.
Follow on Instagram
Copyright © 2025 - Fegreus & Broderick, LLP | Attorney Advertising
Site designed by Two Row Studio
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.