Skip to content
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linked In
Fegreus & Broderick

Fegreus & Broderick

  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Estate Admin
    • Trustee Services
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
  • The Firm
    • Michael Broderick
    • Edward Fegreus
    • Sydney Blomstrom
    • Tatiana Barsukova
  • Contact Us
  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Estate Admin
    • Trustee Services
    • Litigation
    • Real Estate
  • The Firm
    • Michael Broderick
    • Edward Fegreus
    • Sydney Blomstrom
    • Tatiana Barsukova
  • Contact Us

Massachusetts Power of Attorney

By: Michael Broderick
Published: May 16, 2016
Categories:
Probate and Estates

The New York Times recently published an article describing problems with Powers of Attorney (“POAs”) that should create some concern for anyone designated as an attorney-in-fact for a loved-one. In short, the article describes the situation where banks and other financial institutions have refused to honor POAs that were old or that failed to comply with the bank’s own requirements for POAs. Such a situation understandably creates frustration and, at worst, may require the initiation of court proceedings to take control of the finances of the incapacited principal.

Fortunately, there is good news for Massachusetts residents, who need not worry about the concerns raised in the article. The Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code, which governs POAs, specifically addresses this situation. Accordingly, POAs in this state remain exercisable after execution unless the POA specifically states a termination date. In other words, a POA without an express time limit will not expire due to the lapse of time between execution and presentation to a third party. Consequently, financial instructions should not be refusing Massachusetts POAs. If they do, the law arms the attorney-in-fact with authority to hold the financial institution accountable:

The attorney in fact under a durable power of attorney is authorized to prosecute legal action for damages in behalf of the principal in the event of an unreasonable refusal of a third party to honor the authority of a valid durable power of attorney. M.G.L. c. 190B § 5-506.

The law also provides that third parties cannot be held liable for relying in good faith on a POA. Therefore, a well drafted POA should provide that any person dealing with the attorney-in-fact may conclusively rely upon an affidavit executed by such person to the effect that such person does not have knowledge of the termination of the power. Such affidavit will be conclusive proof of the non-revocation or non-termination of the power conferred upon the attorney-in-fact, and will keep the bank happy.

Consequently, Massachusetts residents executing a POA need not worry of the possibility that the document will be nullified by the passage of time or the requirements of any particular bank. The POA will serve its intended purpose and obviate the need to initiate conservatorship proceedings in the event of incapacity.

If you have any questions about the need for a Massachusetts Durable Power of Attorney, please feel free to contact us for a free initial consultation.

 

Post navigation

Previous: Recent MassHealth Planning Cases
Next: Special Needs Trust Update

More Like This

Death and Leases

Personal Representatives and Ongoing Contractual Obligations of the Decedent

Read More

What If There’s No Will?

The Laws of Intestate Succession in Massachusetts

Read More

Trump Tax Reform

Death of the Federal Estate Tax?

Read More
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • Services
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate and Administration of Estates
    • Trustee Services
    • Trust, Estate, and Real Estate Litigation
    • Real Estate Conveyancing
  • Insights
  • Notice Regarding Attorney Advertising

Fegreus & Broderick, LLP

21 Custom House Street, Suite 480
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
t: (617) 737-9100 | f: (617) 737-9123
info@fegreuslaw.com

And to be safe, for fear the beneficiaries will st And to be safe, for fear the beneficiaries will still be able to upset our best efforts to protect them from themselves, we can include in the trusts we create a “spendthrift clause” which says, in effect, the beneficiaries cannot sell their interest in the trust, and so long as the Trustee continues to hold the assets, the beneficiaries’ shares are beyond the reach of their creditors, in whole or in part depending on how the trust is written. 

In other words, the beneficiary is not able to assign their right to trust property in exchange for chips at the casino or the new Porsche 911. 

Thinking about creating a trust for a beloved spendthrift in your life? We would be glad to chat.
A disclaimer is a refusal to accept property befor A disclaimer is a refusal to accept property before it is received. Generally, when one disclaims property, one is treated as having predeceased the person who has passed and the property then passes to the next person or people in line to receive it per the law, estate plan, etc. 

Disclaimers can be effective tools for minimizing or avoiding taxes, fixing errors in estate plans, and redistributing gifts to more appropriate beneficiaries. However, they can be complicated. 

Disclaimers must be perfected within nine months of title passing and meet strict state and federal requirements. Among those is the requirement that the disclaimer be unequivocal and irrevocable (no take-backs), and the initial recipient must not have benefited from the property disclaimed prior to disclaimer. 

Lastly, the initial recipient cannot disclaim property if insolvent or for the purpose of defeating a creditor who has an interest in the recipient’s property pursuant to a judicial process (i.e. a pending lawsuit).
Follow on Instagram
Copyright © 2026 - Fegreus & Broderick, LLP | Attorney Advertising
Site designed by Two Row Studio
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.